Admit it Liberals. Sara Palin is a smart women. You don't like her, and you are just afraid of her.

Eight Cruds today on my comments and no rebutting comments. When you can't attack the message and you are out of subterfuge, try to wound the messenger. That in a microcosm is exactly what the liberals are doing to SP.

by allonzo1 (22.38) on 2/18/10.

0

2

Katzwinkel, I truly feel sorry for you. That anger that you have will be a detriment in your life. My guess, though, is that you probably already know that. Ask your friends for help.

by allonzo1 (22.38) on 2/18/10.

0

2

I believe that there is zero chance of her winning a presidential election, and it sounds like you believe that as well. You also said that you doubt that she will even be an influence. So why the big deal in the ad hominem attacks? What Democrats should be doing for their own short term political benefit is to lay off. Sarah Palin's spliltting the conservative vote is the only chance the Obama has to be a two term president. It only takes a few strategic votes to swing an election, reference Ralph Nader in 2000. I don't remember any outrage in his running for office, and he certainly was not qualified to be president. As far as your assertions about SP. You don't like her speech. That's the way they talk where she comes from. Speech patterns are obviously hard to change, ask Henry Kissinger and Arnold. They have been in the states for how many decades and they still talk like they just got off the boat. You talk about deceit and double talk. She is no worse that any of the bunch in Washington. How about your president? Compare his campaign promises to what he has done, not to mention his declining any knowledge that Jeremiah Wright is a racist. So, i stand by my assertion. You might have even have helped me prove it.

by allonzo1 (22.38) on 2/15/10.

1

3

Admit it Liberals. You are afraid of her, and not because of the notion that she will become President. The fear is that some of the long standing bastion of young liberal women will like her style and, god forbid, see value in conservative thought. While I do believe she is smart and has a special appeal, I must admit that she is not Presidential material. Now to the point of her being smart, give up your personal insults as the ruse that it is. I challenge you out there in ArgueHow Land to compare your high intellect selves to this women. First, I submit that high intellect is correlated to personal accomplishments and wealth. Not to say that all smart people are rich and all dumb people are all poor. That is absurd, but certainly there is a pattern. So, from a personal accomplishment standpoint, stand up if you have ever been the nominee for the VP of the US. Stand up if you have ever been a state governor or simply the mayor of a small town. Stand up if your picture is on the cover of a book of any kind other than your family album, and keep standing if you have made millions of dollars off of the sales of that book. Stand up if you have ever been paid to make a speech to a large audience, let alone to the tune of $100,000. I’m guessing that not one out there is standing. One last challenge, stand up if you think with a couple of month of preparation you could go in front of a television audience of millions of people and appear totally calm and hold your own in a one-on-one debate with a lifelong career politician of the caliber of Joe Biden. Admit it. That collection of accomplishments constitutes the traits of a poised and smart women.



by allonzo1 (22.38) on 2/11/10.

0

4

Take away spell check, add in eye problems and my age, and I'm lucky to get any of the print right considering I am typing in about 8 font. Now that I know that the grammar police are out, I will attempt to be more careful. In any case, in my first entry I believe that I gave adequate support to SP being smart. What have you provided that supports your assertion that she is not? I'm not sure what your reference to Kaczynski was supposed to prove.

by allonzo1 (22.38) on 2/15/10.

0

4

Even *if* your argument was logical or compelling, it still fails to address exactly how or why Liberals fear her. Here's why: Sarah Palin is a lying douchebag moron. She flipped her popularity in beauty pageants and sports journalism into a meager political career, then she hit the lottery when John McCain tried to pull the rug out from underneath voters by choosing the hottest running mate he could find.

I fear that women will admire her or find a role model in her because she is an underhanded sneak who will do or say anything that she has to to further her own motives. But I doubt that will ever happen because she can barely stammer English.

I fear that she will parlay her Jerry-Springer-esque popularity into a position of power that may negatively influence how free Americans are allowed to live their lives due to her very specific and narrow views on religion, family, health care and sexuality. But I doubt that will ever happen because she has "gone rogue."

I fear that she *does* have a very real influence on public opinion when she spouts nonsensical clauses such as "death panel," and that she can inspire panic and hatred in those with a limited capacity for logic, reason and clear thought. And that has already happened.

As for her intelligence, opinion and conjecture are irrelevant. She might have an IQ of 175 for all I know. I sincerely doubt it, but who knows? And who cares? Ted Kaczynski has an IQ of 167. He's a Harvard graduate with a PhD in mathematics. He was the youngest professor ever hired at Berkeley. Rather accomplished, no? He's also the Unabomber.

To assert that Sarah Palin should be admired due to some supposed intelligence (a dubious assumption, at best) is to ignore her record of deceit and double-talk. Intelligence is admirable, but only in the distinct presence of morals that align with your own. Otherwise, all you have is an evil genius.

Lastly, in an effort to espouse the intelligence of Sarah Palin, you spelled her name wrong.


by Katzwinkel (69.41) on 2/15/10.

4

0

I have no doubt that I've helped you prove that Liberals do not like Sarah Palin and that they fear her. Notably, nowhere in your most recent missive do you formulate an argument for her intellect.

So all you have to do is tweak your original topic a little, and I don't think anybody could dispute you: "Admit it, Liberals. Sarah Palin is a dipshit. You don't like her, and you are just afraid of her."

Lastly, in an effort to point out Sarah Palin's intellectual capacity, you referred to her as "a smart women."

by Katzwinkel (69.41) on 2/15/10.

3

0

allonzo1:
People are not crudding your arguments in an effort to sabotage Sarah Palin; people are crudding your arguments because the things you say are asinine and semi-coherent. You are not the messenger. You are the author of this claptrap. Don't blame political agenda on your pisspoor ability to form sentences or maintain a grip on reality.

People refuse to argue with you any further because it's obvious that you're only trying to invoke heartache; a crotchety old troll looking for attention. Because that's what bored old Conservatives do... they try to make the world a more terrible place for everybody else.

by Katzwinkel (69.41) on 2/18/10.

3

0

Admit it Conservatives, Sara Palin is not a smart women. I come here and ask you the question what really has she done...what has she contributed to help this wonderful place that we call the United States. Yes, you are 110% correct, I am afraid of a ruling dictator who thinks that they have the experience and knowledge to run the country... just because she helped the polar bears and penguins by being the Gov of Alaska... Really? Alaska, and she thinks that she would make a good VP? She knows absolutely nothing when it comes to the real world bigger issues then dealing with the polar bears. I feared that if we got a republican got in office (McCain) we would all be going downhill from there. He had picked Palin for the VP position, and the only reason why he picked was because she was a woman, he believed if he could steal the followers that were in favor of Hillary Clinton, he would be in a good state. Great thinking don't you think? Until something happens to McCain like he dies, and we are left with some VP who would not know what to do in the position of Presidency. She was Governor for a short time, mayor of a small city and beauty queen. Sara does not understand world politics. She made a statement that 'she' as governor of Alaska had received info on Russian planes penetrating our air space. The air force general in charges stated that this was not true, and they NEVER called Sara while she was in office. The Russians didn’t violet our air space. Even the Republican Party when Sara was running for VP did not allow her to speak in public without McCain being there to correct her mistakes. She was selected by McCain in a failed attempt to gain the female vote in the U.S this was the only reason why he selected her, certainty not of her intelligence. So yes, we may fear her, but the smart part you have wrong. I’m sorry.

by BeBe08 (48.98) on 3/20/10.

1

0