argument argue about share argue how
 
argue for



pros and cons   against

 
All TopicsCelebrity & Pop CultureMovies

Arguments for and against

2012 (the Movie)

Decent Cast + Apocalypse + Explosions = Good Movie??

started by juszczak on 12/6/09.

2012 (the Movie)
For Against
 
arguesreason
Remarkably good effects.

by juszczak (68.66) on 12/6/09.

20
argumentsreasons

arguesreason
First hour is very effective - fun, scary, a good ride.

by JackCNewell (51.52) on 12/7/09.

10
argumentsreasons

 
 
argumentsdebate
The remaining 2 hours are not tolerable.

by JackCNewell (51.52) on 12/7/09.

10
argumentargue

argumentsdebate
Though the movie uses amazing special effects that leaves the audience seeemingly breathless and on the edge of their seats, the science and story behind the movie sucks. Think about it, in the movie a massive burst of high energy neutrino from the sun causes the Earth's interior to heat up, but in real life Neutrinoes are just harmless and just pass through you with no effect. I'm not also a big fan of the story writting especially at the end of the movie.

by Wilvincent (51.02) on 3/23/10.

10
argumentargue

 
2012 (the Movie)
 
         
argue   for
© 2009 13 Guys Named Ed, LLC   •   About   •   Feedback   •   Sitemap
against   argues