argument argue about share argue how
 
argue for



pros and cons   against

 
Creds and Cruds for
juszczak on 12-11-2009



I love her supporter's typical response to the "liberal media attacks" on their beloved. It's easy to say, "every politician, professor, speaker, interviewee, etc. has gaffes", while failing to notice the statistical regularity of them.

There seems to be an incredible amount of denial going on by her supporters. If a rational person points out the numerous occasions when Palin has attempted to prove her ignorance, they are told they are being overly critical or are sexist, or there is a "gross double standard". As if this is proof to refute the contrary. Not all criticism is politically motivated, sometimes it IS valid.

Sounding Stupid + Being "Folksy" ≠ Smart

Show me her IQ score, have her take a geography or civics test, or just have an interview with someone where she doesn't back up her platform with gut reaction, witticisms, and faith. Otherwise, I will stand by my belief that she is of diminished mental capacity, and I don't want anyone like that running their mouth, let alone the country.
5 Cred1 Crud


WHEN THIS ARGUMENT IS REFUTED, I WILL DELETE THIS COMMENT

Look through the "FOR" list on the left. What don't you see? An argument FOR Sarah Palin, that's what. Every defense of her has nothing to do with her qualifications or abilities, they're only whining about everyone being so mean to poor, poor Sarah (or as Elwoodlaw calls her, "hot moose hunting governor").

Show us a reason "FOR" Sarah Palin, not just "NOT AGAINST" her!
3 Cred2 Crud


May contain BPA
2 Cred1 Crud


By who? One word: "Sovereignty".
3 Cred2 Crud


To pretend that marriage in our modern society is anything but the outward expression of a couple's love for each other (ie: baby making, a cornerstone of stable families, etc.) is ridiculous. We don't live in a primitive village where we rely on our children to help with hunting, gathering, and taking care of the elderly.

Our country was founded on the precepts of individual rights and for anyone to deny those rights to a class of people is hypocritical and wrong.
2 Cred2 Crud


Very, very buggy at the moment and missing some very key features (like the ability to remove someone from a wave). I understand that they are diligently working on the project and it is very early on in the development cycle, but Google may have released this way too early, which may cause problems for its long term success.

Wave's credibility may be shot with all of the tech pundits complaining how half-baked it is and it will take considerable improvement to win over their hearts and minds when it is complete.
2 Cred2 Crud


Most Andrioid phones have a physical keyboard, a must for some users.
2 Cred1 Crud


Even though the operating system has shown a great deal of improvement since 1.0, it has still not achieved the polish of Apple's iPhone user experience.
1 Cred1 Crud


Disconnected hardware ecosystem. Google's writing the software and other manufacturers are making the devices. Most handsets are klunky and poorly designed.
2 Cred1 Crud


More than anything else Monty Python introduced modern English humor to their Yank cousins. Today, we're still amused by their legacy like The Office, Fawlty Towers, and anything with Ricky Gervais in it.
0 Cred1 Crud


I love her supporter's typical response to the "liberal media attacks" on their beloved. It's easy to say, "every politician, professor, speaker, interviewee, etc. has gaffes", while failing to notice the statistical regularity of them.

There seems to be an incredible amount of denial going on by her supporters. If a rational person points out the numerous occasions when Palin has attempted to prove her ignorance, they are told they are being overly critical or are sexist, or there is a "gross double standard". As if this is proof to refute the contrary. Not all criticism is politically motivated, sometimes it IS valid.

Sounding Stupid + Being "Folksy" ≠ Smart

Show me her IQ score, have her take a geography or civics test, or just have an interview with someone where she doesn't back up her platform with gut reaction, witticisms, and faith. Otherwise, I will stand by my belief that she is of diminished mental capacity, and I don't want anyone like that running their mouth, let alone the country.
5 Cred1 Crud


WHEN THIS ARGUMENT IS REFUTED, I WILL DELETE THIS COMMENT

Look through the "FOR" list on the left. What don't you see? An argument FOR Sarah Palin, that's what. Every defense of her has nothing to do with her qualifications or abilities, they're only whining about everyone being so mean to poor, poor Sarah (or as Elwoodlaw calls her, "hot moose hunting governor").

Show us a reason "FOR" Sarah Palin, not just "NOT AGAINST" her!
3 Cred2 Crud


It runs very well on older hardware.
3 Cred1 Crud


Microsoft's marketing strategy for Windows 7 is awful/confusing/terrifying.
1 Cred4 Crud


Microsoft did not learn their lesson from Vista regarding the confusing number of editions. There are currently six on the market: Starter, Home Basic, Home Premium, Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate.
5 Cred2 Crud

 
         
argue   for
© 2009 13 Guys Named Ed, LLC   •   About   •   Feedback   •   Sitemap
against   argues