argument argue about share argue how
 
argue for



pros and cons   against

 
Creds and Cruds for
allonzo1 on 12-1-2009



While deferring action in anticipation of Israel standing up to Iran is a convenient, albeit cowardly strategy, this is a tragic approach. Iran, whose boarders stretch the Persion Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, could easily close the 2 mile shipping lane in the Strait of Hormuz. In fact Iran has already theatened this action if they are attacked by anyone. Through the Straits flow 20 percent of oil traded worldwide. This would spell economic panic the world has yet to see other than during the world wars. A united world approach is needed.
4 Cred0 Crud


The high temperature frying of foodstuffs containing the preservative sodium nitrite creates highly carcinogenic chemicals called nitrosamines. Crispy bacon can kill you!
4 Cred1 Crud


The high temperature frying of foodstuffs containing the preservative sodium nitrite creates highly carcinogenic chemicals called nitrosamines. Crispy bacon can kill you!
4 Cred1 Crud


I assume you mean "By whom." Be that as it may, sovereignty has been the key arguing point against the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty both before and since its signing in 1968. If this is the basis of your dialectic then. we must take it to its limit. If all states and peoples are sovereign, then when it comes to nuclear weaponry, those in favor of sovereignty must also stand behind the premise that anyone with enough money should be able to buy nuclear weapons. Does that make any sense at all. The world community of 189 nations has spoken, and wisely so. Nuclear weaponry and its technology must be controlled. Hear, hear.
3 Cred0 Crud

 
         
argue   for
© 2009 13 Guys Named Ed, LLC   •   About   •   Feedback   •   Sitemap
against   argues